From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: reorganize muxes to a standard pattern Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:21:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20120331082112.2fcc13c3@endymion.delvare> References: <1321220474-11378-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <20111127214847.547542fb@endymion.delvare> <87sjl9gtcv.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20111128092227.3d5d6a25@endymion.delvare> <20111128093835.GA4243@pengutronix.de> <874nxoh8l5.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20111128125751.3d6a3ca7@endymion.delvare> <20120107153820.45ed4b37@endymion.delvare> <20120107144559.GA2537@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120107144559.GA2537-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Peter Korsgaard , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Guenter Roeck , Rodolfo Giometti , Michael Lawnick List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 15:46:00 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 03:38:20PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:57:51 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:58:30 +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > > > > Indeed. If we were to rename it we should also rename struct > > > > gpio_i2cmux_platform_data. > > > > > > > > I don't feel strongly about it - It will break for existing users, but > > > > there's probably not too many of those. Your call. > > > > > > I see exactly 1 user of in the upstream kernel > > > tree, and that is gpio-i2cmux itself. So I'd say no big deal renaming > > > it, and actually if we intend to rename header files and/or structures, > > > the sooner the better. > > > > Wolfram, Peter, any progress here? I think Wolfram was supposed to send > > an updated patch but I did not receive anything. > > -EBUSY :( > > It *is* on my todo-list, though... Any news on this? -- Jean Delvare