From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: i2c-tools: Discussion points about future library Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:04:06 +0200 Message-ID: <20120405080406.GA2510@pengutronix.de> References: <20120404160113.2295c636@endymion.delvare> <20120404174158.GA19773@sirena.org.uk> <20120404212323.59053a1f@endymion.delvare> <4F7CA3D4.8000104@fold.natur.cuni.cz> <20120405094910.1dcc4779@endymion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120405094910.1dcc4779-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: Martin Mokrejs , Mark Brown , Linux I2C , Aurelien Jarno List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > I would also search for the header filenames and invent such names > > which will not clash with any existing. Same for "-li2c" or > > whatever will apear on the ld line. >=20 > No, sorry. I'm not going to invent a fancy name to make sure it isn't > clashing with something out there. If anyone wanted their code to > become the standard Linux i2c library, they should have pushed it to > major Linux distributions. Nobody did AFAICS. +1 --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk99UfYACgkQD27XaX1/VRtGWQCgzCcbm340ZxL4jxPsgOO5a0Bk AjEAn2BNpljA5O9dYTyPhvjHKHBX1/cV =VEKU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq--