From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] i2c/nomadik: runtime PM support Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:16:35 +0200 Message-ID: <20120419111635.GE2206@pengutronix.de> References: <1331213407-10135-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> <20120417143901.GA22406@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xJK8B5Wah2CMJs8h" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Magnus Damm Cc: Linus Walleij , Ben Dooks , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Jonas Aaberg , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Mark Brown List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --xJK8B5Wah2CMJs8h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > I'm a bit hesitant to ack because the runtime suspend/resume callbacks > are used differently than we would do on arch/sh and > arch/arm/mach-shmobile. This difference may or may not be a good > thing. I'm afraid I know too little about the nomadik platform to say > anything wise. =3D) I take this as a not-NACK ;) I don't want to dive too much into the nomadik power management as well, so I will trust the authors here. Since the driver is only used on this platform, I guess a different PM strategy can be fix later if needed. Linus, can you resend the patch another time, please? Thanks, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --xJK8B5Wah2CMJs8h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk+P9BMACgkQD27XaX1/VRsxcACguaW6iSOtiJD0kq9FDyhaZWKm iB0AoKpyqAS9nSx7qHcB/FCyxaZY5Z+G =uS8t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xJK8B5Wah2CMJs8h--