From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 00/10] I2C fixes
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:05:33 +0200
Message-ID: <20120423170533.GH27321@pengutronix.de>
References: <1334842101-20670-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Dx9iWuMxHO1cCoFc"
Return-path: <linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1334842101-20670-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com>
Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ben-linux@fluff.org, tony@atomide.com
List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org


--Dx9iWuMxHO1cCoFc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 06:58:11PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
> This patch series seperates the fixes from other=20
> changes from [2]=20

I also noticed this one in my build. Can you check?

WARNING: modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es).

--=20
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

--Dx9iWuMxHO1cCoFc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk+Vi90ACgkQD27XaX1/VRtFcwCdEU05fv/OsSLynzUkhuCoyPBC
QQwAn0wcJ+th4ks8U8IjTOpxY5CioJml
=/YeM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Dx9iWuMxHO1cCoFc--