* Re: i2c of mux patches inquiry
[not found] ` <e3d3b989-3996-49c7-86fc-2d04873e9e72-dAX9Bq04yCSXHCJdrdq+zrjjLBE8jN/0@public.gmane.org>
@ 2012-04-24 16:08 ` Wolfram Sang
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2012-04-24 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Linn
Cc: Stephen Warren, david.daney-YGCgFSpz5w/QT0dZR+AlfA,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1094 bytes --]
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:33:08AM -0600, John Linn wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> What's the odds of the i2c/of: mux patches making into upstream?
>
> It looks like they're getting some momentum, nice work!
Thanks!
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=commit;h
> =2d9b178f1d5ff652850410b36842b4401ab7e319
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=commit;h
> =7e865fe1ffa449d7f4f5a1946aa0f28b05afcbee
>
> I really want to start using them but also don't like to get a
> dependency on stuff that never makes it upstream.
They are scheduled for the 3.5 merge window. I don't put stuff into my
next branch which I don't intend to send upstream (short-term or
mid-term).
You do have an influence regarding upstreaming by donating tags like
Acked-by, Tested-by or Reviewed-by.
And please ask such questions on the lists, not personally.
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread