From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Marek Vasut <marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
Fabio Estevam <festevam-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: possible MXS-i2c bug
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:59:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120427145936.GD16504@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201204270110.21377.marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 695 bytes --]
Hi,
> I've been thinking about the DMA approach. The problem I found out is that we
> need to transfer all messages we're given at time in one DMA chain ... at least
> that's how I understand it from the FSL manual (see Fig. 27-10 in the mx28
> manual).
I can't follow you: mxs_i2c_xfer() gets a list of messages, yet they
are iterated over in mxs_i2c_xfer_msg(). A single I2C message is
unscattered and can't be bigger than 64KB, so that should be doable?
Am I missing something by already being in weekend-mode? :)
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-27 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201204261326.29388.marex@denx.de>
[not found] ` <201204261326.29388.marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-26 11:42 ` possible MXS-i2c bug Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20120426114201.GC3548-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-26 23:10 ` Marek Vasut
[not found] ` <201204270110.21377.marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-27 14:59 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
[not found] ` <20120427145936.GD16504-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-27 15:08 ` Marek Vasut
[not found] ` <201204271708.53467.marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-27 15:41 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20120427154119.GF16504-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-27 15:53 ` Marek Vasut
[not found] ` <201204271753.39516.marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-27 16:37 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20120427163756.GH16504-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-28 3:03 ` [TEST PATCH] mxs-i2c DMA support Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120427145936.GD16504@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang-bicnvbalz9megne8c9+irq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=festevam-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org \
--cc=shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).