From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: davinci: Free requested IRQ in remove Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 14:36:10 +0200 Message-ID: <20120512123610.GG20673@pengutronix.de> References: <1336053396-24974-1-git-send-email-marcus.folkesson@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DNUSDXU7R7AVVM8C" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1336053396-24974-1-git-send-email-marcus.folkesson-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Marcus Folkesson Cc: Jean Delvare , Ben Dooks , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --DNUSDXU7R7AVVM8C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 03:56:36PM +0200, Marcus Folkesson wrote: > The freed IRQ is not necessary the one requested in probe. > Even if it was, with two or more i2c-controllers it will fails anyway. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Marcus Folkesson Applied to current, thanks! --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --DNUSDXU7R7AVVM8C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk+uWToACgkQD27XaX1/VRuoyQCfQxX5csD6HT6ELM7I3GXq6jOI N3YAn3kFG838Juaxx9AbWY6TSnpnd4ej =uJzO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DNUSDXU7R7AVVM8C--