From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] i2c: i2c-bfin-twi: Move blackfin TWI register access Macro to head file. Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:36:44 +0200 Message-ID: <20120611163644.GH3887@pengutronix.de> References: <1337152826-9850-1-git-send-email-sonic.zhang@analog.com> <1337152826-9850-8-git-send-email-sonic.zhang@analog.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZPDwMsyfds7q4mrK" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Shubhrajyoti Datta Cc: "Zhang, Sonic" , Ben Dooks , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , LKML , "uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org" List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --ZPDwMsyfds7q4mrK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 03:46:06PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Zhang, Sonic wr= ote: > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Shubhrajyoti Datta [mailto:omaplinuxkernel@gmail.com] > >>Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 6:10 PM > >>To: Zhang, Sonic > >>Cc: Ben Dooks; Wolfram Sang; linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org; LKML; uclinux-d= ist- > >>devel@blackfin.uclinux.org > >>Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] i2c: i2c-bfin-twi: Move blackfin TWI register = access > >>Macro to head file. > >> > >>Hi , > >>On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Zhang, Sonic > >>wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>-----Original Message----- > >>>>From: Shubhrajyoti Datta [mailto:omaplinuxkernel@gmail.com] > >>>>Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 5:48 PM > >>>>To: Zhang, Sonic > >>>>Cc: Ben Dooks; Wolfram Sang; linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org; LKML; uclinux= -dist- > >>>>devel@blackfin.uclinux.org > >>>>Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] i2c: i2c-bfin-twi: Move blackfin TWI registe= r access > >>>>Macro to head file. > >>>> > >>>>Hi , > >>>>Some minor comments/ doubts. > >>>>On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:50 PM, =A0 wrote: > >>>>> From: Sonic Zhang > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>A small description may be helpful. > >>>>Also the $SUBJECT says move the patch looks more like the remove. > >>>>Am I missing something. > >>> > >>> The subject says these definitions are moved to a head file by the ot= her patch > >>for Blackfin architecture. > >> > >>Got it thanks. > >> > >>You may want to add a dependency otherwise it might lead to a compilati= on break? > >> > > > > That patch for Blackfin architecture has already been merged into mainl= ine. > Great, >=20 > Apologies for the noise. I don't think this is noise, I agree with you. I'd like to see the commit which added that and the reasoning. Usually, encapsulating the accesses in the driver is good, because no one else should bother. Thanks, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --ZPDwMsyfds7q4mrK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk/WHpwACgkQD27XaX1/VRuaSQCdGS8EjVlcxO0rSKq21suhuBeX y8YAoKMuNQtI/7vHgZ1NhHOzLmLM1dKb =ALKQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZPDwMsyfds7q4mrK--