From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] i2c: tegra: Bug fixes, cleanups and M_NOSTART support Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:50:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20120612085040.GC9230@pengutronix.de> References: <1338901800-23968-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <4FCE3078.1030008@wwwdotorg.org> <4FCE3CD8.8060502@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FCE3CD8.8060502-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Laxman Dewangan Cc: Stephen Warren , "khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org" , "ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org" , "olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org" , "linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:37:36PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > On Tuesday 05 June 2012 09:44 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > >On 06/05/2012 07:09 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > >>This patch series having the: > >>- Handling of late register write due to Tegra PPSB design. > >>- support for I2C_M_NOSTART > >>- Use devm_* for all allocation. > >The series, > > > >Acked-by: Stephen Warren > > > >Note that patch 4 touches context adjacent to Prashant's "i2c: tegra: > >Add clk_prepare/clk_unprepare" patch, which I hope to take through the > >Tegra tree since it's a requirement for the Tegra common clock > >conversion. I don't think this will cause any significant conflict, but > >perhaps it's worth resolving it explicitly. Is it really a requirement? Just wondering if it will cause problems, if Prashant's patch goes in via I2C after arm-soc has been merged. I am fine with simply acking the patch, though. > >Wolfram, perhaps we should put these 4 patches and Prashan'ts into their > >own topic branch so that you can merge it into the I2C tree, and I can > >merge it into the Tegra tree too? Or, I can take everything through > >Tegra if you want, and ack it. Laxman's patches should really go via I2C, I think. Can't we just fix the conflict in arm-soc? Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk/XAuAACgkQD27XaX1/VRvJZACgmJUb4NCK9hURE+7FGYME/+LZ OzEAoKY7E/RqXHNHCLmrYYM0lm5vXHfQ =01H1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s--