From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sascha Hauer Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c i.MX: Fix divider table Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 18:01:53 +0200 Message-ID: <20120705160153.GT30009@pengutronix.de> References: <1341493826-13861-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <20120705145236.GA2735@richard-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120705145236.GA2735@richard-laptop> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Richard Zhao Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org, Wolfram Sang , Ben Dooks , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 10:52:39PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:10:26PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > Measurements on i.MX1 and i.MX53 have shown that the divider values > > in the datasheets are wrong. the values from first, third and fourth > > column were all measured to be 8 higher than in the datasheet. It > > should be safe to assume that the SoCs between i.MX1 and i.MX53 behave > > the same as the i2c unit is unchanged since the i.MX1. > We may need to check with IC guys? Or you've done? I don't have contact to the IC guys. Could you do this? I'd be interested in the results. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |