From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Shubhrajyoti Datta <omaplinuxkernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ben-linux@fluff.org,
tony@atomide.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv11 0/6] I2C cleanups
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:52:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120712125229.GG2194@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM=Q2ct0PUisYGcaX6EAPWT-SmZAgRV_O8mAOodH-V4Q0O-Vww@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1354 bytes --]
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:17:07PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com> wrote:
> > This is a minimal cleanup series.
>
> If there are no further comments can this series be queued?
I just applied a few of them. BTW I get a build warning when compiling the
kernel, maybe someone is interested. It is not related to the patches, though.
===
WARNING: arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o(.data+0x2b5c0): Section mismatch in reference from the variable rx51_si4713_dev to the (unknown reference) .init.data:(unknown)
The variable rx51_si4713_dev references
the (unknown reference) __initdata (unknown)
If the reference is valid then annotate the
variable with __init* or __refdata (see linux/init.h) or name the variable:
*_template, *_timer, *_sht, *_ops, *_probe, *_probe_one, *_console
===
I think this is what I'll pull in for the next merge window. The big OMAP
cleanup (latest version from 3. July) would then go in early into -next for
3.7. Is that OK with the omap-people?
Also, thanks to Shubhrajyoti Datta for reviewing other patches on the
i2c-list, much appreciated.
Thanks,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-12 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-28 15:11 [PATCHv11 0/6] I2C cleanups Shubhrajyoti D
2012-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCHv11 1/6] i2c: omap: Optimise the remove code Shubhrajyoti D
[not found] ` <1340896292-12112-2-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-12 12:18 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-13 11:21 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCHv11 2/6] i2c: omap: Use SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS Shubhrajyoti D
2012-07-12 12:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCHv11 3/6] i2c: omap: Do not initialise the completion everytime Shubhrajyoti D
[not found] ` <1340896292-12112-4-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-28 16:03 ` ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY
[not found] ` <CAAe_U6Jtoj3mixvp+vqNmkr-RC28AfNqZ0syEE5voEr+Odv3zg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-29 1:34 ` Zhang, Shijie
2012-07-12 12:19 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20120712121928.GC2194-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-13 11:05 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCHv11 5/6] i2c: omap: Correct I2C revision for OMAP3 Shubhrajyoti D
[not found] ` <1340896292-12112-6-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-12 12:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-13 11:04 ` Shubhrajyoti
[not found] ` <1340896292-12112-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCHv11 4/6] i2c: omap: Remove the definition of SYSS_RESETDONE_MASK Shubhrajyoti D
[not found] ` <1340896292-12112-5-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-12 12:20 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20120712122053.GD2194-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-13 11:05 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCHv11 6/6] i2c: omap: Recover from Bus Busy condition Shubhrajyoti D
[not found] ` <1340896292-12112-7-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-12 12:22 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20120712122208.GF2194-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-13 11:04 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-07-09 11:47 ` [PATCHv11 0/6] I2C cleanups Shubhrajyoti Datta
2012-07-12 12:52 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
[not found] ` <20120712125229.GG2194-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-13 11:25 ` Shubhrajyoti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120712125229.GG2194@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=omaplinuxkernel@gmail.com \
--cc=shubhrajyoti@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).