From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-mv64xxxx: allow more than one driver instance Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:53:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20120712135303.GL2194@pengutronix.de> References: <1341762785-6918-1-git-send-email-ffainelli@freebox.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="V3eawNQxI9TAjvgi" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1341762785-6918-1-git-send-email-ffainelli-MmRyKUhfbQ9GWvitb5QawA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Florian Fainelli Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, Andrew Lunn , Nicolas Schichan List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --V3eawNQxI9TAjvgi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 05:53:05PM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote: > The driver currently checks the platform device id and rejects platform > device id different from 0. This prevents the registration of a second > i2c controller on systems where a second one might be available (such as > Kirkwood 88F6282). >=20 > CC: Andrew Lunn > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan > Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli Applied to next, thanks. How are your experiences with the driver? Does it still need EXPERIMENTAL? Thanks, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --V3eawNQxI9TAjvgi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk/+1r8ACgkQD27XaX1/VRtKjgCeL3GZZbBmKWSrm2KNwUK3KyS9 ovYAoKkZlgftvgOq7hbFRr9JVUBU2gBA =/Jhq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --V3eawNQxI9TAjvgi--