From: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
To: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: convert struct i2c_msg initialization to C99 format
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 15:14:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120803151412.0cb16ed6@endymion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1343994924-2341-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Hi Shubhrajyoti,
On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 17:25:24 +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
> Convert the struct i2c_msg initialization to C99 format. This makes
> maintaining and editing the code simpler. Also helps once other fields
> like transferred are added in future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> index 2efa56c..33cfdd3 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> @@ -1971,12 +1971,19 @@ static s32 i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, u16 addr,
> unsigned char msgbuf0[I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX+3];
> unsigned char msgbuf1[I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX+2];
> int num = read_write == I2C_SMBUS_READ ? 2 : 1;
> - struct i2c_msg msg[2] = { { addr, flags, 1, msgbuf0 },
> - { addr, flags | I2C_M_RD, 0, msgbuf1 }
> - };
> int i;
> u8 partial_pec = 0;
> int status;
> + struct i2c_msg msg[2];
> +
> + msg[0].addr = addr;
> + msg[0].flags = flags;
> + msg[0].len = 1;
> + msg[0].buf = msgbuf0;
> + msg[1].addr = addr;
> + msg[1].flags = flags | I2C_M_RD;
> + msg[1].len = 0;
> + msg[1].buf = msgbuf1;
>
> msgbuf0[0] = command;
> switch (size) {
Good idea but I see no good reason to switch from struct-wide
initialization to per-field initialization. AFAIK per-field
initialization is less efficient and might leave some fields
uninitialized, while I seem to remember struct-wide initialization sets
them to 0.
Can you please resubmit with struct-wide initialization preserved?
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-03 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-03 11:55 [PATCH] i2c: convert struct i2c_msg initialization to C99 format Shubhrajyoti D
[not found] ` <1343994924-2341-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-03 13:14 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
[not found] ` <20120803151412.0cb16ed6-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-03 13:39 ` Datta, Shubhrajyoti
[not found] ` <CANQgH-bmTdZ1z=Vbeg07mZ-FLRBrzhuf+Wz1Uv2GcU2dWW9TGA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-03 14:14 ` Jean Delvare
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-08-03 11:52 Shubhrajyoti D
[not found] ` <1343994764-2286-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-03 11:54 ` Datta, Shubhrajyoti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120803151412.0cb16ed6@endymion.delvare \
--to=khali-puyad+kwke1g9huczpvpmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).