linux-i2c.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
	swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH REBASE 1/2] i2c: tegra: I2_M_NOSTART functionality not supported in Tegra20
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 14:47:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120818124703.GC12839@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345230155-4252-1-git-send-email-ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6057 bytes --]

On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:32:34AM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> Tegra20 i2c controller does not support the continue transfer
> which implements the I2C_M_NOSTART functionality of i2c
> protocol mangling.
> Removing the I2C_M_NOSTART functionality for Tegra20.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> This is rebased on linux-next-20120816.
> 
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c |   73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
> index 7149625..554f713 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/i2c-tegra.h>
>  #include <linux/of_i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/unaligned.h>
> @@ -114,6 +115,15 @@ enum msg_end_type {
>  };
>  
>  /**
> + * struct tegra_i2c_hw_feature : Different HW support on Tegra
> + * @has_continue_xfer_support: Continue transfer supports.
> + */
> +
> +struct tegra_i2c_hw_feature {
> +	bool has_continue_xfer_support;
> +};
> +
> +/**
>   * struct tegra_i2c_dev	- per device i2c context
>   * @dev: device reference for power management
>   * @adapter: core i2c layer adapter information
> @@ -148,6 +158,7 @@ struct tegra_i2c_dev {
>  	int msg_read;
>  	unsigned long bus_clk_rate;
>  	bool is_suspended;
> +	bool has_continue_xfer_support;

I wonder if it makes sense to carry a pointer here to the
tegra_i2c_hw_feature in use instead of copying all entries by hand,
since they might get more and more.

>  };
>  
>  static void dvc_writel(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, u32 val, unsigned long reg)
> @@ -563,7 +574,17 @@ static int tegra_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[],
>  	if (i2c_dev->is_suspended)
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  
> -	clk_prepare_enable(i2c_dev->div_clk);
> +	/* Support I2C_M_NOSTART only if HW support continue xfer. */
> +	for (i = 0; i < num - 1; i++) {
> +		if ((msgs[i + 1].flags & I2C_M_NOSTART) &&
> +			!i2c_dev->has_continue_xfer_support) {
> +			dev_err(i2c_dev->dev,
> +				"mesg %d have illegal flag\n", i + 1);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +	}

Drivers are requested to explicitly check for features of the I2C bus
(like M_NOSTART) before using them, so I'd skip this extra check.

> +
> +	clk_prepare_enable(i2c_dev->clk);

From a glimpse, this change looks unrelated at least. Even wrong, no?

>  	for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
>  		enum msg_end_type end_type = MSG_END_STOP;
>  		if (i < (num - 1)) {
> @@ -582,8 +603,13 @@ static int tegra_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[],
>  
>  static u32 tegra_i2c_func(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>  {
> -	return I2C_FUNC_I2C | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL | I2C_FUNC_10BIT_ADDR |
> -		I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING | I2C_FUNC_NOSTART;
> +	struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
> +	u32 ret = I2C_FUNC_I2C | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL | I2C_FUNC_10BIT_ADDR |
> +				I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING;
> +
> +	if (i2c_dev->has_continue_xfer_support)
> +		ret |= I2C_FUNC_NOSTART;
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static const struct i2c_algorithm tegra_i2c_algo = {
> @@ -591,6 +617,25 @@ static const struct i2c_algorithm tegra_i2c_algo = {
>  	.functionality	= tegra_i2c_func,
>  };
>  
> +static struct tegra_i2c_hw_feature tegra20_i2c_hw = {
> +	.has_continue_xfer_support = false,
> +};
> +
> +static struct tegra_i2c_hw_feature tegra30_i2c_hw = {
> +	.has_continue_xfer_support = true,
> +};
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
> +/* Match table for of_platform binding */
> +static const struct of_device_id tegra_i2c_of_match[] __devinitconst = {
> +	{ .compatible = "nvidia,tegra30-i2c", .data = &tegra30_i2c_hw, },
> +	{ .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-i2c", .data = &tegra20_i2c_hw, },
> +	{ .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-i2c-dvc", .data = &tegra20_i2c_hw, },
> +	{},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra_i2c_of_match);
> +#endif
> +
>  static int __devinit tegra_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev;
> @@ -600,6 +645,7 @@ static int __devinit tegra_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct clk *fast_clk;
>  	const unsigned int *prop;
>  	void __iomem *base;
> +	const struct tegra_i2c_hw_feature *hw = &tegra20_i2c_hw;
>  	int irq;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> @@ -659,11 +705,18 @@ static int __devinit tegra_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			i2c_dev->bus_clk_rate = be32_to_cpup(prop);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (pdev->dev.of_node)
> +	if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
> +		const struct of_device_id *match;
> +		match = of_match_device(of_match_ptr(tegra_i2c_of_match),
> +						&pdev->dev);
> +		hw = match->data;
>  		i2c_dev->is_dvc = of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node,
>  						"nvidia,tegra20-i2c-dvc");
> -	else if (pdev->id == 3)
> +	} else if (pdev->id == 3) {
>  		i2c_dev->is_dvc = 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	i2c_dev->has_continue_xfer_support = hw->has_continue_xfer_support;
>  	init_completion(&i2c_dev->msg_complete);
>  
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, i2c_dev);
> @@ -751,16 +804,6 @@ static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(tegra_i2c_pm, tegra_i2c_suspend, tegra_i2c_resume);
>  #define TEGRA_I2C_PM	NULL
>  #endif
>  
> -#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
> -/* Match table for of_platform binding */
> -static const struct of_device_id tegra_i2c_of_match[] __devinitconst = {
> -	{ .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-i2c", },
> -	{ .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-i2c-dvc", },
> -	{},
> -};
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra_i2c_of_match);
> -#endif
> -
>  static struct platform_driver tegra_i2c_driver = {
>  	.probe   = tegra_i2c_probe,
>  	.remove  = __devexit_p(tegra_i2c_remove),

Thanks,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-08-18 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-17 19:02 [PATCH REBASE 1/2] i2c: tegra: I2_M_NOSTART functionality not supported in Tegra20 Laxman Dewangan
     [not found] ` <1345230155-4252-1-git-send-email-ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-17 19:02   ` [PATCH REBASE 2/2] i2c: tegra: dynamically control fast clk Laxman Dewangan
     [not found]     ` <1345230155-4252-2-git-send-email-ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-18 18:52       ` Wolfram Sang
2012-08-17 21:35   ` [PATCH REBASE 1/2] i2c: tegra: I2_M_NOSTART functionality not supported in Tegra20 Stephen Warren
2012-08-18 12:47   ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
     [not found]     ` <20120818124703.GC12839-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-18 12:50       ` Laxman Dewangan
     [not found]         ` <502F8F83.5030902-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-18 18:29           ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120818124703.GC12839@pengutronix.de \
    --to=w.sang-bicnvbalz9megne8c9+irq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).