From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 19/23] i2c: omap: always return IRQ_HANDLED Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 23:53:41 +0200 Message-ID: <20120911215341.GB27031@pengutronix.de> References: <1347356538-23835-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com> <1347356538-23835-20-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1347356538-23835-20-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Shubhrajyoti D Cc: linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, Felipe Balbi List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:12:14PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote: > From: Felipe Balbi >=20 > even if our clocks are disabled, we still > handled the IRQ, so we should return IRQ_HANDLED. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi > Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D Can't we just drop this patch since the code gets removed soon anyhow? Or is patch 20/23 changing something I don't see yet? --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlBPsuUACgkQD27XaX1/VRt11gCgvlyAzbGEzh0ZsDKXjQERMU1p bKYAoL87lJZUhbk3108x5PN7X1glNqaN =GCV2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6--