From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/4] drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c: add new driver Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:13:44 +0200 Message-ID: <20120911221344.GF27031@pengutronix.de> References: <4f3dcfbf1e8eab3e251ab3558e9e1e9123643928.1345618760.git.n.voss@weinmann.de> <503B4919.6080306@atmel.com> <503B623C.4030304@atmel.com> <503B7D6E.7090906@atmel.com> <504EF5BF.2090404@atmel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="juZjCTNxrMaZdGZC" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <504EF5BF.2090404-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Nicolas Ferre Cc: "Voss, Nikolaus" , "'ludovic.desroches'" , 'Yanes Martinez Adrian' , "'linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org'" , "'linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org'" , "'linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org'" , "'ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org'" , "'balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org'" , "'h.feurstein-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org'" , "'rmallon-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org'" , "'carsten.behling-0M7HhAU3Y85FsXB23wyQUg@public.gmane.org'" List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --juZjCTNxrMaZdGZC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:26:39AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > On 08/27/2012 04:29 PM, Voss, Nikolaus : > > ludovic.desroches wrote on Monday, August 27, 2012 4:00 PM : > >> For the moment, I don't have the necessary knowledge about the TWI > >> controller to take a decision. I would say it can be done in an other > >> patch in order to have your driver included in the mainline quickly > >> since it doesn't introduce a breakage. > >=20 > > That would be the most pragmatic approach. > > Wolfram, is the anything left to do from my side? >=20 > Wolfram, ping? >=20 > Can we imagine to have this support and the device tree patches from > Ludovic in 3.7-final? Yes. I'd need your ack since it touches mach-specific stuff. Reviewed-by would be even better since you know the HW better than me :) --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --juZjCTNxrMaZdGZC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlBPt5gACgkQD27XaX1/VRuwcACgj3btCafqBDiUtLacOdNljF3Y KaAAmwYMqWuNbweu3cLgu74CXze6xTJC =J9Qi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --juZjCTNxrMaZdGZC--