From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: nomadik: adopt pinctrl support Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:27:15 +0200 Message-ID: <20121010092715.GA10622@pengutronix.de> References: <1348837151-20820-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> <20121006133006.GA25123@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Linus Walleij , Ben Dooks , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Anmar Oueja , Patrice Chotard List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:16:45AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Wolfram Sang wrot= e: >=20 > > And it is also unneeded because of Ulf > > Hansson's patch? >=20 > Hm Ulf's patch is not even in linux-next? Where is this thing merged... It is not merged yet since I was waiting for an answer if my assumption was right that Ulf's patch should go in first. I wasn't 100% sure. If you could resend both patches based on the latest code that would be much appreciated! Thanks, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlB1P3MACgkQD27XaX1/VRsQ0wCgp6iiaiI3falrSKGWSo8REh+R BEkAnjsO1hdExmiDZpWt3MArJzflHk+F =zhPP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM--