From: Felipe Balbi <balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman-1D3HCaltpLuhEniVeURVKkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
Cc: balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
Shubhrajyoti Datta
<omaplinuxkernel-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul-DWxLp4Yu+b8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: RT throttling and suspend/resume (was Re: [PATCH] i2c: omap: revert "i2c: omap: switch to threaded IRQ support")
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:00:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121017140002.GI11394@arwen.pp.htv.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ipaanljt.fsf_-_-1D3HCaltpLuhEniVeURVKkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1973 bytes --]
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 02:39:50PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> + peterz, tglx
>
> Felipe Balbi <balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > The problem I see is that even though we properly return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD
> > and wake_up_process() manages to wakeup the IRQ thread (it returns 1),
> > the thread is never scheduled. To make things even worse, ouw irq thread
> > runs once, but doesn't run on a consecutive call. Here's some (rather
> > nasty) debug prints showing the problem:
>
> [...]
>
> >> [ 88.721923] try_to_wake_up 1411
> >> [ 88.725189] ===> irq_wake_thread 139: IRQ 72 wake_up_process 0
> >> [ 88.731292] [sched_delayed] sched: RT throttling activated
>
> This throttling message is the key one.
>
> With RT throttling activated, the IRQ thread will not be run (it
> eventually will be allowed much later on, but by then, the I2C xfers
> have timed out.)
>
> As a quick hack, the throttling can be disabled by seeting the
> sched_rt_runtime to RUNTIME_INF:
>
> # sysctl -w kernel.sched_rt_runtime_us=-1
>
> and a quick test shows that things go back to working as expected. But
> we still need to figure out why the throttling is hapenning...
>
> So I started digging into why the RT runtime was so high, and noticed
> that time spent in suspend was being counted as RT runtime!
>
> So spending time in suspend anywhere near sched_rt_runtime (0.95s) will
> cause the RT throttling to always be triggered, and thus prevent IRQ
> threads from running in the resume path. Ouch.
>
> I think I'm already in over my head in the RT runtime stuff, but
> counting the time spent in suspend as RT runtime smells like a bug to
> me. no?
>
> Peter? Thomas?
it looks like removing console output completely (echo 0 >
/proc/sysrq-trigger) I don't see the issue anymore. Let me just run for
a few more iterations to make sure what I'm saying is correct.
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-17 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-15 1:51 [PATCH] i2c: omap: revert "i2c: omap: switch to threaded IRQ support" Paul Walmsley
2012-10-15 7:16 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <20121015071657.GA22818-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-15 15:05 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-10-16 12:58 ` Shubhrajyoti Datta
2012-10-16 13:33 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-10-16 13:37 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-10-16 21:39 ` RT throttling and suspend/resume (was Re: [PATCH] i2c: omap: revert "i2c: omap: switch to threaded IRQ support") Kevin Hilman
[not found] ` <87ipaanljt.fsf_-_-1D3HCaltpLuhEniVeURVKkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-17 14:00 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2012-10-17 14:35 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-10-17 23:06 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-18 5:51 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <20121018055136.GF11137-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-19 14:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-19 16:30 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-10-19 23:28 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-19 23:54 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-22 9:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-22 16:47 ` Kevin Hilman
[not found] ` <87ehkqihdh.fsf-1D3HCaltpLuhEniVeURVKkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-23 9:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121017140002.GI11394@arwen.pp.htv.fi \
--to=balbi-l0cymroini0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=khilman-1D3HCaltpLuhEniVeURVKkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=omaplinuxkernel-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=paul-DWxLp4Yu+b8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).