linux-i2c.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman-1D3HCaltpLuhEniVeURVKkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
Cc: balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Shubhrajyoti Datta
	<omaplinuxkernel-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul-DWxLp4Yu+b8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: RT throttling and suspend/resume (was Re: [PATCH] i2c: omap: revert "i2c: omap: switch to threaded IRQ support")
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:00:02 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121017140002.GI11394@arwen.pp.htv.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ipaanljt.fsf_-_-1D3HCaltpLuhEniVeURVKkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1973 bytes --]

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 02:39:50PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> + peterz, tglx
> 
> Felipe Balbi <balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > The problem I see is that even though we properly return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD
> > and wake_up_process() manages to wakeup the IRQ thread (it returns 1),
> > the thread is never scheduled. To make things even worse, ouw irq thread
> > runs once, but doesn't run on a consecutive call. Here's some (rather
> > nasty) debug prints showing the problem:
> 
> [...]
> 
> >> [   88.721923] try_to_wake_up 1411
> >> [   88.725189] ===> irq_wake_thread 139: IRQ 72 wake_up_process 0
> >> [   88.731292] [sched_delayed] sched: RT throttling activated
> 
> This throttling message is the key one.
> 
> With RT throttling activated, the IRQ thread will not be run (it
> eventually will be allowed much later on, but by then, the I2C xfers
> have timed out.)
> 
> As a quick hack, the throttling can be disabled by seeting the
> sched_rt_runtime to RUNTIME_INF:
> 
>         # sysctl -w kernel.sched_rt_runtime_us=-1
> 
> and a quick test shows that things go back to working as expected.  But
> we still need to figure out why the throttling is hapenning...
> 
> So I started digging into why the RT runtime was so high, and noticed
> that time spent in suspend was being counted as RT runtime!
> 
> So spending time in suspend anywhere near sched_rt_runtime (0.95s) will
> cause the RT throttling to always be triggered, and thus prevent IRQ
> threads from running in the resume path.  Ouch.
> 
> I think I'm already in over my head in the RT runtime stuff, but
> counting the time spent in suspend as RT runtime smells like a bug to
> me. no?
> 
> Peter? Thomas?

it looks like removing console output completely (echo 0 >
/proc/sysrq-trigger) I don't see the issue anymore. Let me just run for
a few more iterations to make sure what I'm saying is correct.

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-17 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-15  1:51 [PATCH] i2c: omap: revert "i2c: omap: switch to threaded IRQ support" Paul Walmsley
2012-10-15  7:16 ` Felipe Balbi
     [not found]   ` <20121015071657.GA22818-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-15 15:05     ` Paul Walmsley
2012-10-16 12:58 ` Shubhrajyoti Datta
2012-10-16 13:33   ` Felipe Balbi
2012-10-16 13:37     ` Felipe Balbi
2012-10-16 21:39     ` RT throttling and suspend/resume (was Re: [PATCH] i2c: omap: revert "i2c: omap: switch to threaded IRQ support") Kevin Hilman
     [not found]       ` <87ipaanljt.fsf_-_-1D3HCaltpLuhEniVeURVKkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-17 14:00         ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2012-10-17 14:35           ` Felipe Balbi
2012-10-17 23:06             ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-18  5:51               ` Felipe Balbi
     [not found]                 ` <20121018055136.GF11137-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-19 14:00                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-19 16:30                     ` Felipe Balbi
2012-10-19 23:28                     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-19 23:54                     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-22  9:52                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-22 16:47                         ` Kevin Hilman
     [not found]                           ` <87ehkqihdh.fsf-1D3HCaltpLuhEniVeURVKkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-23  9:19                             ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121017140002.GI11394@arwen.pp.htv.fi \
    --to=balbi-l0cymroini0@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=khilman-1D3HCaltpLuhEniVeURVKkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=omaplinuxkernel-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=paul-DWxLp4Yu+b8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).