From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Marek Vasut <marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: mxs: remove broken PIOQUEUE support
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 17:08:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121101160828.GA18425@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201211011528.17596.marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1386 bytes --]
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 03:28:17PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Wolfram Sang,
>
> > This I2C master can do DMA and PIOQUEUE (PIO with FIFO). Originally,
> > only PIOQEUE
>
> PIOQUEUE ;-)
Yup, right!
>
> > was supported, then DMA support was added. The original
> > intention was to keep PIOQUEUE since it has less overhead what is nice
> > for small transfers. However, runtime switching between PIOQEUE and DMA
> > depending on the transfer size never worked despite a lot of trying.
> > Since PIOQUEUE mode itself was flaky (polling at places where interrupts
> > failed to work) and the implementation also imposed a size limit for
> > transfers, it is best to remove the support altogether which makes the
> > driver a lot cleaner and more robust. If somebody really wants less
> > overhead, plain PIO mode could still be implemented with the addidtional
> > advantage that this mode is also available on MX23, too.
>
> Yes, looks to be the way to go.
>
> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
Thanks.
BTW have you tried combining all i2c-messages (msgs[]) of the transfer
into one DMA chain? That would reduce overhead, too, no?
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-01 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-01 11:56 [PATCH] i2c: mxs: remove broken PIOQUEUE support Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <1351771003-6071-1-git-send-email-w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-01 14:28 ` Marek Vasut
[not found] ` <201211011528.17596.marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-01 16:08 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
[not found] ` <20121101160828.GA18425-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-01 16:12 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121101160828.GA18425@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang-bicnvbalz9megne8c9+irq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org \
--cc=shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).