linux-i2c.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: ben-linux@fluff.org, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: omap: ensure writes to dev->buf_len are ordered
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 23:23:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121101222316.GC22956@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1351155648-20429-1-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1700 bytes --]

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:00:48PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> if we allow compiler reorder our writes, we could
> fall into a situation where dev->buf_len is reset
> for no apparent reason.
> 
> This bug was found with a simple script which would
> transfer data to an i2c client from 1 to 1024 bytes
> (a simple for loop), when we got to transfer sizes
> bigger than the fifo size, dev->buf_len was reset
> to zero before we had an oportunity to handle XDR
> Interrupt. Because dev->buf_len was zero, we entered
> omap_i2c_transmit_data() to transfer zero bytes,
> which would mean we would just silently exit
> omap_i2c_transmit_data() without actually writing
> anything to DATA register. That would cause XDR
> IRQ to trigger forever and we would never transfer
> the remaining bytes.
> 
> After adding the memory barrier, we also drop resetting
> dev->buf_len to zero in omap_i2c_xfer_msg() because
> both omap_i2c_transmit_data() and omap_i2c_receive_data()
> will act until dev->buf_len reaches zero, rendering the
> other write in omap_i2c_xfer_msg() redundant.
> 
> This patch has been tested with pandaboard for a few
> iterations of the script mentioned above.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
> ---
> 
> This bug has been there forever, but it's quite annoying.
> I think it deserves being pushed upstream during this -rc
> cycle, but if Wolfram decides to wait until v3.8, I don't
> mind.

I would add this into 3.7, but what about the comments suggesting to use
barrier()?

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-01 22:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-25  9:00 [PATCH] i2c: omap: ensure writes to dev->buf_len are ordered Felipe Balbi
2012-10-25 16:38 ` Kevin Hilman
     [not found]   ` <8739124idt.fsf-1D3HCaltpLuhEniVeURVKkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-25 18:03     ` Felipe Balbi
     [not found] ` <1351155648-20429-1-git-send-email-balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-25  9:16   ` Shubhrajyoti Datta
2012-10-26 23:01   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-10-27 10:50     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-27 15:59       ` Paul Walmsley
     [not found]         ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1210271545390.16409-rwI8Ez+7Ko+d5PgPZx9QOdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-28  4:11           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-11-01 22:23 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
     [not found]   ` <20121101222316.GC22956-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-02  8:54     ` Felipe Balbi
     [not found]       ` <20121102085447.GE17063-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-05  8:04         ` [PATCH v2] " Felipe Balbi
2012-11-14 11:20           ` Wolfram Sang
     [not found]             ` <20121114112050.GG5954-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-14 14:22               ` [PATCH v3] " Felipe Balbi
2012-11-14 16:46                 ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121101222316.GC22956@pengutronix.de \
    --to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).