From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] i2c: omap: ensure writes to dev->buf_len are ordered
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:46:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121114164600.GA1020@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352902965-25666-1-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1444 bytes --]
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 04:22:45PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> if we allow compiler reorder our writes, we could
> fall into a situation where dev->buf_len is reset
> for no apparent reason.
>
> This bug was found with a simple script which would
> transfer data to an i2c client from 1 to 1024 bytes
> (a simple for loop), when we got to transfer sizes
> bigger than the fifo size, dev->buf_len was reset
> to zero before we had an oportunity to handle XDR
> Interrupt. Because dev->buf_len was zero, we entered
> omap_i2c_transmit_data() to transfer zero bytes,
> which would mean we would just silently exit
> omap_i2c_transmit_data() without actually writing
> anything to DATA register. That would cause XDR
> IRQ to trigger forever and we would never transfer
> the remaining bytes.
>
> After adding the memory barrier, we also drop resetting
> dev->buf_len to zero in omap_i2c_xfer_msg() because
> both omap_i2c_transmit_data() and omap_i2c_receive_data()
> will act until dev->buf_len reaches zero, rendering the
> other write in omap_i2c_xfer_msg() redundant.
>
> This patch has been tested with pandaboard for a few
> iterations of the script mentioned above.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Applied to for-current, thanks!
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-14 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-25 9:00 [PATCH] i2c: omap: ensure writes to dev->buf_len are ordered Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <1351155648-20429-1-git-send-email-balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-25 9:16 ` Shubhrajyoti Datta
2012-10-26 23:01 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-10-27 10:50 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-27 15:59 ` Paul Walmsley
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1210271545390.16409-rwI8Ez+7Ko+d5PgPZx9QOdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-28 4:11 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-25 16:38 ` Kevin Hilman
[not found] ` <8739124idt.fsf-1D3HCaltpLuhEniVeURVKkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-25 18:03 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-11-01 22:23 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20121101222316.GC22956-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-02 8:54 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <20121102085447.GE17063-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-05 8:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Felipe Balbi
2012-11-14 11:20 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20121114112050.GG5954-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-14 14:22 ` [PATCH v3] " Felipe Balbi
2012-11-14 16:46 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121114164600.GA1020@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).