From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: mxs: Handle i2c DMA failure properly Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:54:53 +0100 Message-ID: <20121120085453.GC14722@pengutronix.de> References: <1353216308-7338-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> <201211191500.32205.marex@denx.de> <20121120083946.GB14722@pengutronix.de> <201211200947.36430.marex@denx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hOcCNbCCxyk/YU74" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201211200947.36430.marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Marek Vasut Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Fabio Estevam , Tim Michals List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --hOcCNbCCxyk/YU74 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Since the driver currently advertises properly that it cannot do > > SMBUS_QUICK, the addition of that is not a bugfix but a feature > > addition, so I'll apply it to for-next. >=20 > Actually, I'd say apply the DMA termination fix to stable and the SMBUS_Q= UICK=20 > enabling to -next if you want to be completely correct. You're right, one= part=20 > of the patch is a bugfix, the rest if feature addition. OK then. --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --hOcCNbCCxyk/YU74 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlCrRV0ACgkQD27XaX1/VRvM+QCgq3C1cTHAeA3gTUUWLrngFrHB EcIAoKoabI8K5AeNNFLbx8oBTlYPvvrg =tOtN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hOcCNbCCxyk/YU74--