From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: mxs: Handle i2c DMA failure properly Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:47:36 +0100 Message-ID: <201211200947.36430.marex@denx.de> References: <1353216308-7338-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> <201211191500.32205.marex@denx.de> <20121120083946.GB14722@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20121120083946.GB14722-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Fabio Estevam , Tim Michals List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Dear Wolfram Sang, > > btw. I guess we won't be able to squeeze these into 3.7 anymore, right? > > Even if I'd say these are fixes. > > After the outcoming of the discussion with Tim, I will apply the single > patch. But I won't apply Fabio's patch to enable I2C for MX23 since > there seem to be issues. Sounds good. > Since the driver currently advertises properly that it cannot do > SMBUS_QUICK, the addition of that is not a bugfix but a feature > addition, so I'll apply it to for-next. Actually, I'd say apply the DMA termination fix to stable and the SMBUS_QUICK enabling to -next if you want to be completely correct. You're right, one part of the patch is a bugfix, the rest if feature addition. Best regards, Marek Vasut