public inbox for linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia.edu>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>,
	Ben Dooks  <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
	Rudolf Marek <r.marek@assembler.cz>,
	Jochen Friedrich <jochen@scram.de>,
	Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
	Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com>,
	Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>,
	Barry Song <baohua.song@csr.com>,
	"Mark M. Hoffman" <mhoffman@lightlink.com>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 065/493] i2c: remove use of __devexit_p
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:46:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121120144621.5d2c213a@endymion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1353349642-3677-65-git-send-email-wfp5p@virginia.edu>

On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:20:14 -0500, Bill Pemberton wrote:
> CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devexit_p is no longer
> needed.

As mentioned on the lm-sensors list for hwmon patches already, I think
it would be much clearer to not split __devexit, __devexit_p, __devinit
etc. removal into separate patches. One patch per subsystem would be
easier to review and apply. If patches grow too large then you'd rather
split in a different direction, for example drivers/i2c/muxes vs.
drivers/i2c/busses or even grouped by related bus drivers (see entries
"I2C OVER PARALLEL PORT" and "I2C/SMBUS CONTROLLER DRIVERS FOR PC" in
MAINTAINERS for examples of meaningful groups.)

-- 
Jean Delvare

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-20 13:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1353349642-3677-1-git-send-email-wfp5p@virginia.edu>
     [not found] ` <1353349642-3677-1-git-send-email-wfp5p-4Ng6DfrEGID2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-19 18:19   ` [PATCH 002/493] i2c: remove CONFIG_HOTPLUG ifdefs Bill Pemberton
     [not found]     ` <1353349642-3677-2-git-send-email-wfp5p-4Ng6DfrEGID2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-20  8:13       ` Jean Delvare
     [not found]         ` <20121120091313.29614db3-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-20 13:43           ` Bill Pemberton
2012-11-19 18:20   ` [PATCH 065/493] i2c: remove use of __devexit_p Bill Pemberton
     [not found]     ` <1353349642-3677-65-git-send-email-wfp5p-4Ng6DfrEGID2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-20  6:59       ` Shubhrajyoti Datta
2012-11-20 13:46     ` Jean Delvare [this message]
     [not found]       ` <20121120144621.5d2c213a-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-22 21:49         ` Wolfram Sang
     [not found]           ` <20121122214915.GD14851-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-26 13:52             ` Bill Pemberton
2012-11-19 18:21   ` [PATCH 134/493] drivers/misc: " Bill Pemberton
2012-11-19 18:22   ` [PATCH 207/493] i2c: remove use of __devinit Bill Pemberton
     [not found]     ` <1353349642-3677-207-git-send-email-wfp5p-4Ng6DfrEGID2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-20  8:20       ` Jean Delvare
     [not found]         ` <20121120092046.24496415-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-20 13:23           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
     [not found]             ` <20121120132342.GP3332-l+eeeJia6m9vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-20 13:37               ` Jean Delvare
2012-11-21 11:02       ` Barry Song
2012-11-19 18:24   ` [PATCH 306/493] i2c: remove use of __devinitdata Bill Pemberton
2012-11-19 18:25   ` [PATCH 357/493] i2c: remove use of __devinitconst Bill Pemberton
2012-11-19 18:26   ` [PATCH 413/493] misc: remove use of __devexit Bill Pemberton
2012-11-19 18:25 ` [PATCH 404/493] i2c: " Bill Pemberton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121120144621.5d2c213a@endymion.delvare \
    --to=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=baohua.song@csr.com \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn \
    --cc=jacmet@sunsite.dk \
    --cc=jochen@scram.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mhoffman@lightlink.com \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=r.marek@assembler.cz \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=vitalywool@gmail.com \
    --cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=wfp5p@virginia.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox