From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: tfp410 and i2c_bus_num Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:57:47 -0800 Message-ID: <20121121175747.GV18567@atomide.com> References: <50A64D35.9050109@ti.com> <20121116151959.GA19411@arwen.pp.htv.fi> <50A65E40.9040208@ti.com> <20121116182146.GC20496@arwen.pp.htv.fi> <50A72390.3050509@ti.com> <20121118113437.GB30462@arwen.pp.htv.fi> <50A9D3DD.6040807@ti.com> <20121119092744.GB4211@arwen.pp.htv.fi> <50AA1376.6060801@ti.com> <20121119121630.GC15540@arwen.pp.htv.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121119121630.GC15540-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Felipe Balbi Cc: Tomi Valkeinen , linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org * Felipe Balbi [121119 04:25]: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 01:09:42PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > On 2012-11-19 11:27, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > > > fair enough... it looks like this is going nowhere, so best we come back > > > to this later. No reason to block your patch. > > > > Well, the patch is a fix for stable kernels, so even if we had a great > > idea how to rewrite the dss device handling, it wouldn't affect this > > patch =). > > ok good ;-) FYI I'm assuming Tomi will resend the patch as there were some changes requested early on in the thread. Tony