From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] i2c: at91: add dma support Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:40:56 +0100 Message-ID: <20121122214056.GC14851@pengutronix.de> References: <1352911493-6979-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> <20121116170514.GA21903@pengutronix.de> <50ACA2D4.9040904@atmel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IpbVkmxF4tDyP/Kb" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50ACA2D4.9040904-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "ludovic.desroches" Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, plagnioj-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --IpbVkmxF4tDyP/Kb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >Thanks, looks mostly good. I have problems applying patch 3. What is > >this series based against? > > >=20 > It was based against v3.7-rc4. Do you want me to rebase it against an > over version? That should be fine, but it still fails. The other patches apply, but have offsets which is suspicious, too. Can you re-check, please? --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --IpbVkmxF4tDyP/Kb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlCum+gACgkQD27XaX1/VRvSHwCgw/SijjOcudV7TcvVWeuq9W6n kT8AnirkYhhNaUlZyStgPoLoJWrjsz77 =vTrG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IpbVkmxF4tDyP/Kb--