From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH 065/493] i2c: remove use of __devexit_p Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:49:15 +0100 Message-ID: <20121122214915.GD14851@pengutronix.de> References: <1353349642-3677-1-git-send-email-wfp5p@virginia.edu> <1353349642-3677-65-git-send-email-wfp5p@virginia.edu> <20121120144621.5d2c213a@endymion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="osDK9TLjxFScVI/L" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121120144621.5d2c213a-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: Bill Pemberton , gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Ben Dooks , Rudolf Marek , Jochen Friedrich , Peter Korsgaard , Tony Lindgren , Olof Johansson , Vitaly Wool , Guan Xuetao , Barry Song , "Mark M. Hoffman" , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --osDK9TLjxFScVI/L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:46:21PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:20:14 -0500, Bill Pemberton wrote: > > CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devexit_p is no longer > > needed. >=20 > As mentioned on the lm-sensors list for hwmon patches already, I think > it would be much clearer to not split __devexit, __devexit_p, __devinit > etc. removal into separate patches. One patch per subsystem would be > easier to review and apply. If patches grow too large then you'd rather > split in a different direction, for example drivers/i2c/muxes vs. > drivers/i2c/busses or even grouped by related bus drivers (see entries > "I2C OVER PARALLEL PORT" and "I2C/SMBUS CONTROLLER DRIVERS FOR PC" in > MAINTAINERS for examples of meaningful groups.) I agree with Jean here. Is there a V2 planned? With a change like this? --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --osDK9TLjxFScVI/L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlCundsACgkQD27XaX1/VRvVDQCfb648pSwyIGE88RY9RW4sDgf2 fpMAn2qfmShNxBl1Oz5Jg8yV6GDi3TcE =yTbX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --osDK9TLjxFScVI/L--