From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver i2c-nforce2: fix pointer CodingStyle issues Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 11:30:37 +0100 Message-ID: <20121218103037.GC2612@pengutronix.de> References: <1355778259-8445-1-git-send-email-laurent.navet@gmail.com> <20121218105223.0184d4a3@endymion.delvare> <20121218100906.GB2612@pengutronix.de> <20121218112355.69369ee1@endymion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ncSAzJYg3Aa9+CRW" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121218112355.69369ee1-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: Laurent Navet , ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --ncSAzJYg3Aa9+CRW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Are you also able to build-test the changes? >=20 > Most certainly yes, this driver has almost no dependencies. I will > build-test it anyway. Me too :) I just wanted to express that I would love to see a compile test before submission, even for checkpatch thingies. Can save some hazzle for all of us. --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --ncSAzJYg3Aa9+CRW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlDQRc0ACgkQD27XaX1/VRuVKwCgt/rjkHZ6aKRst3EsaOIoSMhV D/YAoJe2IoxOZJ84CiXmH8e9fTo0a9V/ =XeWT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ncSAzJYg3Aa9+CRW--