From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: Fabio Estevam
<fabio.estevam-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: mxs: Fix misuse init_completion
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 04:47:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201301210447.46939.marek.vasut@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1353475146-28669-1-git-send-email-marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
Hi,
> The init_completion() call does reinit not only the variable carrying
> the flag that the completion finished, but also initialized the
> waitqueue associated with the completion. On the contrary, the
> INIT_COMPLETION() call only reinits the flag.
>
> In case there was anything still stuck in the waitqueue, subsequent call
> to init_completion() would be able to create possible race condition. This
> patch uses the proper function and moves init_completion() into .probe()
> call of the driver, to be issued only once.
>
> Note that such scenario is impossible, since two threads can never enter
> the mxs_i2c_xfer_msg(), since whole this section is protected by mutex in
> I2C core. This by no means allows this issue to exit though.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
Why is this not applied / not in stable please?
Also, what about the other MXS I2C patches?
Thanks!
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-21 3:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-21 5:19 [PATCH] i2c: mxs: Fix misuse init_completion Marek Vasut
[not found] ` <1353475146-28669-1-git-send-email-marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-21 3:47 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
[not found] ` <201301210447.46939.marek.vasut-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-23 9:55 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201301210447.46939.marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--to=marek.vasut-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=fabio.estevam-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).