From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Linux OMAP Mailing List
<linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH REBASE 0/6] i2c: omap: misc changes
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:58:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130123095813.GG3767@nekote.pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130114191628.GB9402-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 09:16:28PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 06:34:03PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > this is just a rebase of the previous series adding support
> > for amount of bytes transferred upon NACK.
> >
> > Well, actually the patches implementing transferred bytes
> > reporting aren't here because we need to discuss how to move
> > forward.
> >
> > This series is just a preparation for that, but it also
> > contains a at least one bugfix.
> >
> > Each and every patch has been tested with pandaboard, it
> > would be nice to get Tested-bys from other folks on other
> > platforms before pushing this for v3.9 (there's more than
> > enough time for that).
> >
> > Note that we're also dropping b_hw flag since that becomes
> > useless since we'll never set STT and STP together anymore.
> >
> > Give it a good round of test, please.
>
> Wolfram, I have these patches rebased on top of v3.8-rc3 if you wish.
> Let me know if I should resend them (again).
Yes, please rebase on top of Aaro's patches (probably in v3.8-rc5).
Patches look mostly good, have to think more about what Patch 5 is
wanting to achieve at the end of the day.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-23 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-14 16:34 [PATCH REBASE 0/6] i2c: omap: misc changes Felipe Balbi
2012-12-14 16:34 ` [PATCH REBASE 1/6] i2c: omap: no need to access platform_device Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <1355502849-9289-1-git-send-email-balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-12-14 16:34 ` [PATCH REBASE 2/6] i2c: omap: also complete() when stat becomes zero Felipe Balbi
2012-12-14 16:34 ` [PATCH REBASE 4/6] i2c: omap: in case of VERSION_2 read IRQSTATUS_RAW but write to IRQSTATUS Felipe Balbi
2012-12-14 16:34 ` [PATCH REBASE 5/6] i2c: omap: wait for transfer completion before sending STP bit Felipe Balbi
2013-01-14 19:16 ` [PATCH REBASE 0/6] i2c: omap: misc changes Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <20130114191628.GB9402-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-23 9:58 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2013-01-23 10:23 ` [PATCH 0/6] i2c: deferred STP Felipe Balbi
2013-01-23 10:23 ` [PATCH 2/6] i2c: omap: also complete() when stat becomes zero Felipe Balbi
2013-01-24 9:05 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-01-24 9:13 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <20130124091339.GF27304-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-24 9:37 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-01-24 9:56 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-01-23 10:23 ` [PATCH 3/6] i2c: omap: improve 'rev' a little bit Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <1358936588-16375-1-git-send-email-balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-23 10:23 ` [PATCH 1/6] i2c: omap: no need to access platform_device Felipe Balbi
2013-01-23 10:23 ` [PATCH 4/6] i2c: omap: in case of VERSION_2 read IRQSTATUS_RAW but write to IRQSTATUS Felipe Balbi
2013-01-23 10:23 ` [PATCH 5/6] i2c: omap: wait for transfer completion before sending STP bit Felipe Balbi
2013-01-23 20:10 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-01-24 7:35 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-01-24 7:42 ` [PATCH 5/6 v2] " Felipe Balbi
2013-01-23 10:23 ` [PATCH 6/6] i2c: omap: get rid of b_hw flag Felipe Balbi
2013-01-23 20:05 ` [PATCH 0/6] i2c: deferred STP Aaro Koskinen
[not found] ` <20130123200540.GE23057-R3WNPi76c83LsdW6vOPryG4HOFkwEHDbMR2xtNvyitY@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-24 16:11 ` Aaro Koskinen
2012-12-14 16:34 ` [PATCH REBASE 3/6] i2c: omap: improve 'rev' a little bit Felipe Balbi
2012-12-14 16:34 ` [PATCH REBASE 6/6] i2c: omap: get rid of b_hw flag Felipe Balbi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130123095813.GG3767@nekote.pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang-bicnvbalz9megne8c9+irq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).