From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH REBASE 0/6] i2c: omap: misc changes Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:58:13 +0100 Message-ID: <20130123095813.GG3767@nekote.pengutronix.de> References: <1355502849-9289-1-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com> <20130114191628.GB9402@arwen.pp.htv.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130114191628.GB9402-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Felipe Balbi Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List , Tony Lindgren List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 09:16:28PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 06:34:03PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > this is just a rebase of the previous series adding support > > for amount of bytes transferred upon NACK. > > > > Well, actually the patches implementing transferred bytes > > reporting aren't here because we need to discuss how to move > > forward. > > > > This series is just a preparation for that, but it also > > contains a at least one bugfix. > > > > Each and every patch has been tested with pandaboard, it > > would be nice to get Tested-bys from other folks on other > > platforms before pushing this for v3.9 (there's more than > > enough time for that). > > > > Note that we're also dropping b_hw flag since that becomes > > useless since we'll never set STT and STP together anymore. > > > > Give it a good round of test, please. > > Wolfram, I have these patches rebased on top of v3.8-rc3 if you wish. > Let me know if I should resend them (again). Yes, please rebase on top of Aaro's patches (probably in v3.8-rc5). Patches look mostly good, have to think more about what Patch 5 is wanting to achieve at the end of the day.