From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Ding Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: busses/i2c-pxa.c: fix potential null pointer dereference error Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 11:25:40 +0100 Message-ID: <20130205102540.GC9969@gmail.com> References: <1360015899-13706-1-git-send-email-dinggnu@gmail.com> <20130205000517.GB9969@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Haojian Zhuang Cc: Kyungmin Park , Wolfram Sang , Andrew Morton , Karol Lewandowski , Haojian Zhuang , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 09:14:08AM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote: > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Cong Ding wrote: > > If it goes to eclk through line 1107, the variable res would be NULL. It will > > cause a null pointer dereference error if we call release_mem_region. > > > > Signed-off-by: Cong Ding > > --- > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c > > index 1034d93..00df535 100644 > > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c > > @@ -1211,7 +1211,8 @@ eremap: > > eclk: > > kfree(i2c); > > emalloc: > > - release_mem_region(res->start, resource_size(res)); > > + if (res) > > + release_mem_region(res->start, resource_size(res)); > > return ret; > > } > > > > > > No. I don't agree on this. Your fix can't resolve all potential issues. > > i2c = kzalloc(sizeof(struct pxa_i2c), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!i2c) { > ret = -ENOMEM; > goto emalloc; > } > > ret = i2c_pxa_probe_dt(dev, i2c, &i2c_type); > if (ret > 0) > ret = i2c_pxa_probe_pdata(dev, i2c, &i2c_type); > if (ret < 0) > goto eclk; > > res = platform_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > irq = platform_get_irq(dev, 0); > if (res == NULL || irq < 0) { > ret = -ENODEV; > goto eclk; > } > > if (!request_mem_region(res->start, resource_size(res), res->name)) { > ret = -ENOMEM; > goto eclk; > } > > We shouldn't jump to eclk for these error cases. Then we needn't to add > checking on res. So what do you suggest to do for these error cases? - cong