From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [4/7] i2c-designware: use dynamic adapter numbering on Lynxpoint Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 11:06:05 +0200 Message-ID: <20130409090605.GC28509@the-dreams.de> References: <1363867800-23861-4-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1363867800-23861-4-git-send-email-mika.westerberg-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mika Westerberg Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, Jean Delvare , Andy Shevchenko , Christian Ruppert List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 02:09:57AM -0000, Mika Westerberg wrote: > It is not good idea to mix static and dynamic I2C adapter numbering. In > this particular case on Lynxpoint we had graphics I2C adapter which took > the first numbers preventing the designware I2C driver from using the > adapter numbers it preferred. > > Fix this by switching to use dynamic adapter numbering on Intel Lynxpoint. > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg I am fearing regressions here if the bus numbering changes.