From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [4/7] i2c-designware: use dynamic adapter numbering on Lynxpoint Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:23:19 +0300 Message-ID: <20130409092319.GF21818@intel.com> References: <1363867800-23861-4-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20130409090605.GC28509@the-dreams.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130409090605.GC28509@the-dreams.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, ben-linux@fluff.org, Jean Delvare , Andy Shevchenko , Christian Ruppert List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:06:05AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 02:09:57AM -0000, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > It is not good idea to mix static and dynamic I2C adapter numbering. In > > this particular case on Lynxpoint we had graphics I2C adapter which took > > the first numbers preventing the designware I2C driver from using the > > adapter numbers it preferred. > > > > Fix this by switching to use dynamic adapter numbering on Intel Lynxpoint. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg > > I am fearing regressions here if the bus numbering changes. There are no users for this dynamic numbering yet since it was introduced with the Lynxpoint support.