From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] I2C: Fix i2c fail problem when a process is terminated by a signal on octeon in 3.8 Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:30:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20130419183057.GA3702@the-dreams.de> References: <11412343.361631366270816380.JavaMail.weblogic@epv6ml12> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <11412343.361631366270816380.JavaMail.weblogic@epv6ml12> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: =?utf-8?B?7Iah7J2A67SJ?= Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 07:40:16AM +0000, =EC=86=A1=EC=9D=80=EB=B4=89 w= rote: >=20 > I rewrite my patch because the patch before i sent have many white sp= ace. > Thanks! This should have been below the "---" after the sigend-off. > --- > I've been debugging the abnormal operation of i2c on octeon. > If a process is terminated by signal in the middle of i2c operation, > next i2c read operation which is done by another process was failed. > So i changed to ignore signal in the middle of i2c operation. > After that the problem was not reproduced. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Eunbong Song Applied to for-next, thanks!