From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] I2C: Change the value of octeon i2c adapter timeout value Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:27:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20130423162751.GA3228@the-dreams.de> References: <11281802.80061366444168759.JavaMail.weblogic@epml02> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <11281802.80061366444168759.JavaMail.weblogic@epml02> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: EUNBONG SONG Cc: "linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hi, what mail client do you use? It seems to break message threading on my side :( > > Have you been writing to EEPROMS? Their erase/write cycle might be > > longer. But I am not forcing you to change the value, just giving some > > suggestions. > > My board has i2c mux, temp sensor, eeprom. And I added some debugging code for measuring i2c response time as below and > run i2c operation for each device. > The maximum respeonse time was 500usec(under 1msec). So 20 msec is enough for adapter timeout. Well, OK, I don't mind. We can increase it later if needed. Applied to for-next, thanks! Please have a look later how I changed your commit messages to see the preferred style.