From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-mv64xxx: Fix timing issue on Armada XP (errata FE-8471889) Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 18:25:00 +0200 Message-ID: <20130607182500.10593e73@skate> References: <1370620140-17177-1-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <1370620140-17177-2-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1370620140-17177-2-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Gregory CLEMENT Cc: Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Ezequiel Garcia , Sebastian Hesselbarth , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Nicolas Pitre , Lior Amsalem , Maen Suleiman , Tawfik Bayouk , Shadi Ammouri , Eran Ben-Avi , Yehuda Yitschak , Nadav Haklai , Ike Pan , Chris Van Hoof , Dan Frazier , Leif Lindholm , Jon Masters , David Marlin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zbigniew Bodek List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Dear Gregory CLEMENT, On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 17:48:59 +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > +/* > + * 5us delay in order to avoid repeated start > + * timing violation on Armada XP SoC. > + */ > +static int mv64xxx_i2c_errata_delay; This should probably be a per-I2C controller variable, i.e in mv64xxx_i2c_data. > + if (!mv64xxx_i2c_errata_delay && > + of_machine_is_compatible("marvell,armadaxp")) > + mv64xxx_i2c_errata_delay = 1; I am wondering whether it should be done this way, or using a separate DT property. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com