From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] ARM: dts: mvebu: Introduce a new compatible string for mv64xxx-i2c Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:18:36 -0600 Message-ID: <20130621171836.GC10905@obsidianresearch.com> References: <1371821529-13791-1-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <1371821529-13791-5-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <20130621140707.GO31667@titan.lakedaemon.net> <51C46001.30500@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51C46001.30500-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Sebastian Hesselbarth Cc: Jason Cooper , Thomas Petazzoni , Andrew Lunn , Yehuda Yitschak , Ike Pan , Tawfik Bayouk , Wolfram Sang , Dan Frazier , Nicolas Pitre , David Marlin , Eran Ben-Avi , Nadav Haklai , Maen Suleiman , Lior Amsalem , Shadi Ammouri , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Ezequiel Garcia , Jon Masters , Gregory CLEMENT , Chris Van Hoof , Leif Lindholm , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 04:15:29PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > from a quick check of the patch set (which you forgot to send to LKML) > I am wondering why you didn't update the of matches struct with the new > compatible for "marvell,mv78230-i2c"? This will save you from still > having "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c" as additional compatible to match device > and driver. With that the above should also be s/and/or/. Agree, I noticed the same things. Alos, the compatible string should be: compatible = "marvell,mv78230-i2c", "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c"; (note the order reversal, most specific is first) and I think it is better to use the 'data' field of of_device_id than a of_is_compatible call. The former is sensitive to order of the compatible string, the latter is not. Jason