From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: i2c-mxs: Use DMA mode even for small transfers Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 06:20:17 +0200 Message-ID: <201307260620.17711.marex@denx.de> References: <1372713261-20551-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com> <1374799579.2480.1.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1374799579.2480.1.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ben Hutchings Cc: Fabio Estevam , Shawn Guo , wsa@the-dreams.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com, to-fleischer@t-online.de, Fabio Estevam , stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Dear Ben Hutchings, > On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 00:09 -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > Hi Marek, > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > Yes, the big question is if we want to use this patch or fix the PIO. I > > > think this one is much less intrusive, so I'd vouch for yours for 3.10 > > > . > > > > Correct. Also according to Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt : > > > > "Rules on what kind of patches are accepted, and which ones are not, into > > the "-stable" tree: > > > > .... > > > > - It cannot be bigger than 100 lines, with context." > > > > Your PIO fix is really appreciated, but it surpasses 100 lines, so it > > would be better if we go with this one first so that it can reach > > 3.10, and then we can use your PIO fix later. > > That one is not a hard and fast rule, but small localised fixes are > preferred if possible. Full agreement on this one, let's apply this patch. Best regards, Marek Vasut