From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 v2] mfd: add STw481x driver Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:06:29 +0100 Message-ID: <20130917080629.GT16984@lee--X1> References: <1379094851-26385-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <20130916091956.GF3999@lee--X1> <20130916104009.GA29403@sirena.org.uk> <20130916135118.GD29403@sirena.org.uk> <20130916152104.GA3909@katana> <20130916153414.GN16984@lee--X1> <20130916160001.GC3909@katana> <20130916160537.GO16984@lee--X1> <20130916162428.GE29403@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130916162428.GE29403-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Wolfram Sang , Linus Walleij , "linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Samuel Ortiz , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Wang Shilong List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 16 Sep 2013, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:05:37PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > So in the mean time are you happy with this "dummy" approach? >=20 > > > No. "dummy" is reserved for a dummy device in case an i2c slave n= eeds > > > more than one address. The proper solution would be if > > > i2c_sysfs_new_device() could recognize the of_device_ids. >=20 > > Okay, thanks for clarifying. >=20 > Or for now to use something like stw481x (even if it's never expected= to > actually make a difference). If Linus wants to resubmit, I'm happy with that. --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog