From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Vincent Stehlé"
<vincent.stehle-QFKgK+z4sOrR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-designware: define i2c_dw_pci_runtime_idle only with runtime pm
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:22:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130927082259.GC28875@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130927024313.GB3159@katana>
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 04:43:13AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:24:03AM +0200, Vincent Stehlé wrote:
> > Make sure i2c_dw_pci_runtime_idle() is defined only when actually used, when
> > CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is defined.
> >
> > This fixes the following compilation warning:
> >
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c:188:12: warning: ‘i2c_dw_pci_runtime_idle’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle-QFKgK+z4sOrR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
>
> I wonder if this fix is complete? Mika?
>
> > ---
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c
> > index f6ed06c..2b5d3a6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c
> > @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ static int i2c_dw_pci_resume(struct device *dev)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME
> > static int i2c_dw_pci_runtime_idle(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > int err = pm_schedule_suspend(dev, 500);
> > @@ -194,6 +195,7 @@ static int i2c_dw_pci_runtime_idle(struct device *dev)
> > return 0;
> > return -EBUSY;
> > }
> > +#endif
> >
> > static const struct dev_pm_ops i2c_dw_pm_ops = {
>
> Shouldn't this be using UNIVERSAL_DEV_PM_OPS with the suspend and resume
> function #ifdeffed by CONFIG_PM_SLEEP?
Yes, I think that would be better.
>
> > .resume = i2c_dw_pci_resume,
> > --
> > 1.8.4.rc3
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-27 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-26 22:24 [PATCH] i2c-designware: define i2c_dw_pci_runtime_idle only with runtime pm Vincent Stehlé
[not found] ` <1380234243-23787-1-git-send-email-vincent.stehle-QFKgK+z4sOrR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-27 2:43 ` Wolfram Sang
2013-09-27 8:22 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130927082259.GC28875@intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg-vuqaysv1563yd54fqh9/ca@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=vincent.stehle-QFKgK+z4sOrR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox