From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] I2C support for AMD Hudson-1 Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 10:01:31 -0800 Message-ID: <20131217180131.GB2840@roeck-us.net> References: <20131217063226.GD25105@phys.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131217063226.GD25105-vpGm2Noi6jeZvKxeG3EEhw@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Christian Herzog Cc: lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 07:32:26AM +0100, Christian Herzog wrote: > Dear list, > > I'm currently beta testing a pretty cool embedded board for router > applications etc. (http://www.pcengines.ch/apu.htm) that sports a Hudson-1 FCH > which is pretty similar to the Hudson-2 your module supports but sufficiently > different so that i2c-piix4 doesn't work. > I found a patched i2c-piix4 source that adds support for the Hudson-1 and it > works beautifully: http://www.men.de/products/13SC24-90.html#t=overview > Now I'm wondering if you would be willing to get this patch into lm-sensors > and also the kernel. > If there's anything I can do to help, please let me know. > I expect those boards to become at least as popular as their alix predecessors > were, so out-of-the-box kernel support would be nice. > Wrong mailing list. Copying linux-i2c. Guenter