From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Ripard Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] mv64xxx updates Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:29:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20140218112930.GE3142@lukather> References: <20140213094117.GA3934@katana> <1392323793-4125-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> <20140213215100.1d714c4b@skate> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9l24NVCWtSuIVIod" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140213215100.1d714c4b@skate> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Andrew Lunn , Kevin Hilman , Jason Cooper , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Ezequiel Garcia , Gregory CLEMENT , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Sebastian Hesselbarth , Thomas Petazzoni List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --9l24NVCWtSuIVIod Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 09:51:00PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Wolfram Sang, >=20 > On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:36:28 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > So, this is a series I came up with trying to fix the issue found by Ke= vin. > > Patches 1+2 are hopefully fixing the bug (in theory, I don't have the H= W). > > Patches 3-5 are RFC, and if patch 3 actually works (see the CHECKME), t= hen 4+5 > > are further cleanup possibilities. And there is still more potential, I= mainly > > wanted to give some inspiration and awareness that the driver could nee= d some > > more love. Please test at least 1+2, comments to 3-5 very welcome. > >=20 > > Sorry for the delay, I got distracted by an NMI. >=20 > I'm adding Maxime Ripard in Cc, since he is the maintainer of the > Allwinner platform, which also uses this I2C driver. So I guess he > would like to be notified of such changes in order to test that the > driver still works for him. I just gave a try to these patches, on my A31 board with the extra patches sent previously. Tested-by: Maxime Ripard Maxime --=20 Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com --9l24NVCWtSuIVIod Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTA0QaAAoJEBx+YmzsjxAgEcAQAK2LZwvkQIkO6sbedlLI7o6p T/pX5P4xal9sTjKweAIufH1uENIeVm7gTrIAW+4jzZxFCrnVQZpq1TvfjagHIyce MNqx72jh1j7qPf7IC3CBrl8yLU0FkIfBzqkmWByLKX+972+H4HwyQjG14f36+71W k/feeN5ElAQUHAxy54Ci0wVtenK7FIKDX8qbO97yznKHqoBExQNoPk+4ucwn9jPT PIflQ87CRN5CkQ9HxXKgTWGAXjwQK8okbkEU6tV0Dpz+PSGrJBI2V0j1focfr/xE AxTNGqEyCu+77gKgZ6PgkZ3zj31KEnGkBQh0SiWynqmgynZX1PJwHpq2Ug4zbsSk k1jHtfP29ancmeSAYVBDL0/NWDK0SjeTM8v0gw+pVj8whr0hOK4znpQFzb0oilXf lBMV7WAIdP/4csoDhiU4i33y0UKaQsAPFkvHZn0Uj7qFhoGHVwYf/Yynu3KT1kg6 K3XK+qI7wg5QHqczL8GJ92JSlutuB7ZGUJVVn+r1t9zfXod0RKBDYl440oFxUuko VPIweW8/H6obN9pqWXuY1VUvs3dlAFteta6mLAEw0vA1pcEZo2IulG1eZfupBaJQ qWKUJ9QEt1XzvtBs5sYoEn+oaRzd1V24D8MAo44MlGTqCBgAYeK4vzCGW0UtQT/Z iU4fv30jztWNYXeuyZEl =MHYl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9l24NVCWtSuIVIod--