From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] i2c: sh_mobile: add devicetree documentation
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 09:23:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140502072303.GB2647@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqKgwKjag2hRSaDwoejuXRDxDgWwtpnS1gijQbVo0h_MjQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 813 bytes --]
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 08:02:10PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > Hi Wolfram,
> >
> > CC devicetree
Yes. Thanks, Geert.
> >> +Required properties:
> >> +- compatible : "renesas,iic-<soctype>". "renesas,rmobile-iic" as fallback
> >
> > Please also list all supported values, so checkpatch can validate DTS compatible
> > properties against this binding document.
>
> You could add this pattern to checkpatch as well. I really wish
> Renesas would follow normal convention of <vendor>,<chip>-<device>.
The binding is already applied and this patch just adds forgotten
documentation. Can we keep this documentation describing the current
state for now and discuss the binding convention seperately?
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-02 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-30 22:21 [PATCH 0/6] i2c: sh_mobile: cleanups Wolfram Sang
2014-04-30 22:21 ` [PATCH 1/6] i2c: sh_mobile: replace magic hex values with constants Wolfram Sang
2014-04-30 22:21 ` [PATCH 2/6] i2c: sh_mobile: improve error handling Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <1398896470-24663-3-git-send-email-wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-30 22:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-05-02 7:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-04-30 22:21 ` [PATCH 3/6] i2c: sh_mobile: honor DT bus speed settings Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <1398896470-24663-1-git-send-email-wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-30 22:21 ` [PATCH 4/6] i2c: sh_mobile: add devicetree documentation Wolfram Sang
2014-04-30 22:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-05-01 1:02 ` Rob Herring
2014-05-02 7:23 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2014-04-30 22:21 ` [PATCH 6/6] i2c: sh_mobile: devm conversion, irq setup Wolfram Sang
2014-04-30 22:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-04-30 22:21 ` [PATCH 5/6] i2c: sh_mobile: devm conversion, low hanging fruits Wolfram Sang
2014-04-30 22:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140502072303.GB2647@katana \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox