From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-i801: Fix the alignment of the device table Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 12:00:39 +0200 Message-ID: <20140717120039.0889a3fa@endymion.delvare> References: <20140623103658.57df2c14@endymion.delvare> <20140716172309.GD2759@katana> <20140717082930.0dcad551@endymion.delvare> <20140717084157.GA2740@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140717084157.GA2740@katana> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Linux I2C , James Ralston List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:41:57 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: >=20 > > One possibility is to switch to tabs and shift all columns (but the > > first) by 4 to the right. This rules out the addition of a column i= n > > the future, but otherwise fulfills your desire. >=20 > I'd like that. Plus, I am not so strict with the 80 char limit. If th= ere > is another feature, then be it on column 80+. I don't think the table > will grow to 100+ chars in the future. If so, we probably need to > redesign it anyhow. Agreed. > > To be honest, I don't really care. All I wanted is that columns are > > properly aligned. If the plan above makes you happier then fine wit= h > > me, I'll do that. >=20 > Please do. And thanks for doing annoying whitespace work. No problem. Above 30=B0C that's about all my brain is good at anyway ;-= ) --=20 Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support