From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: stub: Add support for SMBus block commands
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 15:40:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140717154020.650ad59c@endymion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140717132135.GI2740@katana>
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 15:21:35 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 07:23:03AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > SMBus block commands are different to I2C block commands since
> > the returned data is not normally accessible with byte or word
> > commands on other command offsets. Add linked list of 'block'
> > commands to support those commands.
> >
> > Access mechanism is quite simple: Block commands must be written
> > before they can be read. The first write selects the block length.
> > Subsequent writes can be partial. Block read commands always return
> > the number of bytes selected with the first write.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> > ---
> > v2: Make new functionality only available on request via functionality
> > module parameter
> > Add more details about SMBus block mode support to documentation
> > Use correct sizeof() variable in devm_kzalloc
> > Use stub_find_block() only in SMBus block command itself.
> > Store first word of block data in chip->words[].
> > When writing block data and the written data is longer than
> > the first write, bail out with debug message indicating the reason
> > for the error.
>
> Thanks for doing this and thanks to Jean for the thorough review.
You're welcome.
> The thing I miss is the documentation that SMBUS_BLOCK must explicitly
> be activated and the description how to do it. A comment in the driver,
> above STUB_FUNC_* defines might not hurt as well.
Good point.
> Also, I'd prefer to squash Jean's "increasing block length" patch into
> this one if both of you are fine with that?
Yes, I would be perfectly fine with that.
Guenter, can you please send an updated patch?
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-17 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-07 14:23 [PATCH v2] i2c: stub: Add support for SMBus block commands Guenter Roeck
2014-07-08 19:54 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20140708215453.0677d3ed-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-08 20:05 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-12 9:20 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20140712112019.618d8a03-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-12 14:26 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-12 15:05 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 7:21 ` Jean Delvare
2014-07-13 15:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-13 15:13 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20140713171343.0a4ba58d-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-13 15:46 ` Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <53C2A9E1.2080807-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-13 18:29 ` Sanford Rockowitz
2014-07-17 13:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-07-17 13:40 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
[not found] ` <20140717154020.650ad59c-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-17 16:56 ` [PATCH v3] " Guenter Roeck
2014-07-17 17:12 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140717154020.650ad59c@endymion.delvare \
--to=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).