From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-stub: Avoid an array overrun on I2C block transfers Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 11:09:16 +0200 Message-ID: <20140718090916.GA2765@katana> References: <20140713171717.25497712@endymion.delvare> <20140717172720.GE2901@katana> <20140717175749.GA25303@roeck-us.net> <20140717205028.76c1bc66@endymion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140717205028.76c1bc66-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: Guenter Roeck , Linux I2C List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > With this clarified, Wolfram, what is is that you do not understand? Dunno anymore, probably the confusion confused me :) --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTyOQ7AAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2yKUQAJ7pbZNTajQoJngycri3LSSw 999BOt8Z/CyBYTvb5P97MwhyGy4Qs0ULvhjnf5+x4hXsDT/wNxQue4LWBxBfOwTC dne/iocoviGfG2wHuyPWG+fDdfe1UpAKPZf1XK0GBqPij7IGJtJc63dAF7B79b5L kzL1i8hyYcQPH7gEUat1OnKDkPnW4HIwCVBjfvoioxQJtLw+QazVx9ylx8SkMcoG 98O+jSqvENsBwqH3gfb3j/OVOCs63WoyEUMpOM2xxrhNcsOi44Y+hQoKPTqXZysV kayVoTMnkC6gy1vdu2iEa3FBYc/+JRqTdTJxGrZR9LubVT2FdiapmsgYpeeVr4yQ qGDP0Z3f7yMdvOVQBbaKLnO2997mhGRRpxOirDqGrSlopqs9vfmVarc2LaAoNi+N 5tOaWZdseJq5MHW9gXZsY45fyVH/VDqvcoFhFNNeOufwIvc/DIYdMPd36ohHibTZ rBeao12xtZ5uhez2pOuwD4m/RB4CeZL8RvZG1rGNRXlXBl3fn5GRoh4kE3WmBz91 ilrNorAkJMkuT9Xf068AtByb7y6UFaYfuFUqNIDyD4BaV5rjQB4C5aKD1d6SvRUK C85Pss+lXY83vu6iZOTSBu2rDieUaPAs0KsiFGAtX8T9cZSlgfcmSXxWStvrNZsj FBjmWh5vaxpwhenzeEIX =sDto -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF--