From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel@stlinux.com, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/8] i2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:46:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140915224621.GG25162@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABxcv==OXd+uePcB8zDzB-DDmr9ci6zscHX5TCauWoTO6E4fpg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> [adding Sjoerd as cc who was the one that raised the module auto-loading issue]
>
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> Placing this firmly back on your plate. I truly hope we don't miss
> >> another merge-window. This patch-set has the support of some pretty
> >> senior kernel maintainers, so I hope acceptance shouldn't be too
> >> difficult.
> >>
> >> As previously discussed I believe it should be okay for an I2C device
> >> driver _not_ supply an I2C ID table to match to. The I2C subsystem
> >> should be able to match via other means, such as via OF tables. The
> >> blocking factor during our previous conversation was to keep
> >> registering via sysfs up and running. This set does that.
> >
> > As mentioned in another thread, modaliases are one other possible side
> > effect. As Javier correctly mentions, the beaviour does not really
> > change with your patchset. Yet, if we remove i2c_device_id from drivers
> > too carelessly, they might not be bound anymore.
> >
>
> Right, removing the I2C ID table even from drivers that don't really
> need it (e.g: IP blocks only present in DT platforms) will as you said
> break module auto-loading. Probing will work since the OF table is
> used to match the device in i2c_device_match() but is the I2C table
> what is used to fill the valid module aliases with the current
> behavior of i2c_device_uevent(), the aliases filled from the OF table
> are never used.
>
> So what I propose is to do it incrementally:
>
> 1) Merge Lee's series since that is definitely a step in the right
> direction to not make an I2C table mandatory (still will be needed for
> module auto loading though).
>
> 2) On a follow-up series, make sure that all I2C drivers have a proper
> OF table and that are using the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of,...) macro to
> fill the of:<foo> module aliases. That way the modules will have the
> proper aliases of the form "of:<foo>" besides the "i2c:<foo>" one.
> (even when always i2c:<foo> is reported to user-space currently).
>
> 3) Apply the patch I posted [0] that changes the behavior of
> i2c_device_uevent() to report the OF uevent env vars to user-space in
> case of DT probing which after 2) should not regress any driver module
> auto-loading since all drivers should fill the of:<foo> aliases.
This sounds resonable.
> After this, DT-only drivers will only need an OF table and legacy
> drivers will only need an I2C table. Drivers that support both will
> still need the two tables though which is a drawback of this approach
> since unnecessary duplication will exist on these drivers and can
> cause issues when both tables are not in sync as we saw on the issue
> reported by Sjoerd on [1].
>
> So an alternate approach could be to do the opposite, just remove the
> OF tables entirely from the I2C drivers and only use the I2C table
> even for DT-only drivers. This is possible since i2c_device_match()
> will succeed even without an OF table because i2c_match_id() matches
> for compatible strings and what is reported as uevent is what is in
> the I2C table anyways. I believe that is what Sjoerd suggested but
> I'll let him comment on that in case I misunderstood.
This would be really bad. It would go completely against what I have
working to achieve and OF conventions.
> By the way, the SPI subsystem has the same behavior, I raised the issue on [2].
>
> Best regards,
> Javier
>
> [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/11/269
> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/9/100
> [2]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/11/458
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-15 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-28 14:35 [PATCH RESEND 0/8] i2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing Lee Jones
2014-08-28 14:35 ` [PATCH 1/8] i2c: Add pointer dereference protection to i2c_match_id() Lee Jones
2014-08-28 14:35 ` [PATCH 3/8] i2c: Match using traditional OF methods, then by vendor-less compatible strings Lee Jones
2014-08-28 14:35 ` [PATCH 4/8] i2c: Make I2C ID tables non-mandatory for DT'ed devices Lee Jones
2014-08-28 14:35 ` [PATCH 6/8] i2c: Provide a temporary .probe2() call-back type Lee Jones
[not found] ` <1409236538-21274-7-git-send-email-lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-12 13:50 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-08-28 14:35 ` [PATCH 7/8] mfd: 88pm860x: Move over to new I2C device .probe() call Lee Jones
[not found] ` <1409236538-21274-1-git-send-email-lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2014-08-28 14:35 ` [PATCH 2/8] i2c: Add the ability to match device to compatible string without an of_node Lee Jones
2014-09-12 13:46 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-08-28 14:35 ` [PATCH 5/8] i2c: Export i2c_match_id() for direct use by device drivers Lee Jones
2014-08-28 14:35 ` [PATCH 8/8] mfd: as3722: Rid driver of superfluous I2C device ID structure Lee Jones
2014-08-29 8:45 ` [PATCH RESEND 0/8] i2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing Wolfram Sang
2014-08-29 8:58 ` Lee Jones
2014-09-12 13:46 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-09-12 17:32 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-09-15 22:46 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2014-09-16 8:00 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140915224621.GG25162@lee--X1 \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=javier@dowhile0.org \
--cc=kernel@stlinux.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).