From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] i2c: rcar: add renesas,i2c-rcar-gen1/gen2 in DT compatible Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:04:47 +0900 Message-ID: <20140922020446.GG14899@verge.net.au> References: <87r40uw7rp.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <20140807001805.GE32652@verge.net.au> <8761i5kuel.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <20140807011025.GA3284@verge.net.au> <8738d9kojw.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com> <87zjfgkhae.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com> <87y4v0k89a.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com> <20140919171845.GC2874@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140919171845.GC2874@katana> Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Kuninori Morimoto , Magnus Damm , Linux-SH , Linux-I2C List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 07:18:51PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > This approach has no effect to current feature, > > and can keep compatible for current and future, > > and can reduce / cleanup driver in the future. > > I defer the patch series for now. Maybe we should talk about it at our > next meeting? That is fine by me.