From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] mfd: cros_ec: Instantiate sub-devices from device tree Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 15:48:46 +0100 Message-ID: <20140925144846.GC21351@lee--X1> References: <1410428289-18229-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <1410428289-18229-7-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <20140917163114.GL30918@lee--X1> <541A8E88.6050707@collabora.co.uk> <20140919001512.GA29852@lee--X1> <54241E74.9000403@collabora.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54241E74.9000403@collabora.co.uk> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: Wolfram Sang , Dmitry Torokhov , Doug Anderson , Simon Glass , Bill Richardson , Andrew Bresticker , Derek Basehore , Todd Broch , Olof Johansson , Andreas Faerber , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Lee, >=20 > On 09/19/2014 02:15 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > >>=20 > >> As explained above, DT, non-DT and x86 platforms instantiate the c= ros-ec-dev > >> cells but DT platforms can define other child nodes. But I can rem= ove the > >> conditional if you want and reintroduce it once cros-ec-dev suppor= t is added. > >=20 > > Yes, that makes sense. I only care about doing what's right for > > Mainline, so if it doesn't make sense here, then we shouldn't be do= ing > > it. > >=20 >=20 > Understood, that's why I dropped this since as explained earlier, it = makes more > sense to include this change once the cros_ec_dev driver is pushed to= upstream. >=20 > The last version of the series (v4) I posted a week ago [0], does not= include > this patch so I hope the series can be picked for 3.18 since most of = the patches > were already acked by you. Unfortunately this is going to have to wait until v3.19 now, as Linus is closing the -rcs early. I have subsequently applied my last patch to the MFD tree for v3.18. It will be good for these patches to get some soak testing in -next anyway, rather than rush them in. --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog